Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

280 S.W.3d 101

Young v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 20, 2009

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2009-01-20

Decided 2009-01-20

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Nathaniel Young appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his “Motion to Re-Open Original Postconviction Case Att’y Daniel Reardon Failed to File an Amended 29.15 Motion” (the Motion). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court did not err in denying the Motion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

/280/sw3d/101 · .json · Public domain