Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 280 SW3D 235 - Layton v. State

Layton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

33 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Montgomery v. State · Kelly v. State · Villarreal v. State · Lankston v. State · Zillender v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is no evidence as to the dosage taken by Appellant, the exact times of ingestion, or the half-life of the drug in the human body. Considering the length of time between the ingestion of the medication and the time of arrest, a lay juror is not in a position to determine whether Xanax and Valium, taken more than 12 hours before arrest, would have any effect on Appellant’s intoxication.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.