Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 280 SW3D 425 - Phillip Bundy v. State

Phillip Bundy v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 371st Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Schad v. Arizona · Carstea v. Poplar Tree Homeowners Ass'n · United States v. Monton · Ngo v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Now, if you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or about the 7th day of December, 2011, in Denton County, Texas, the defendant, PETRIT DIKO, did then and there intentionally or knowingly cause the death of an individual, namely, Mimoza Diko, by striking or cutting or stabbing Mimo-za Diko with a screwdriver ór a knife or scissors or a metal bed frame or a piece of wood or an object unknown to the Grand Jury; -OR- If you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or about the 7th day of December,'2011, in Denton County, Texas, the defendant, PETRIT DIKO, did then and there, with intent to cause serious bodily injury to an individual, namely, Mimoza Diko, commit an act clearly dangerous to human life that caused the death of said Mimoza Diko, by striking or cutting or stabbing Mimo-za Diko with a. screwdriver or a knife or scissors or a metal bed frame or a piece of wood or an object unknown to the Grand Jury, then you will find the defendant, guilty , of murder as charged in the indictment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.