Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 280 U.S. 197 - Wabash Ry Co v. Barclay Austin

Wabash Ry Co v. Barclay Austin’s Empirical Analysis

280 U.S. 197 · 1930

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 12 district · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2014 · most notably American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission (1945), 86 F. Supp. 201 - Farmers Cooperative Co. v. Birmingham (1949)

4 federal appellate · 12 district · 21 state decisions

190193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedBarclay v. Wabash Ry. Co. (from Second Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Workman v. Boone · New York Co v. Nickals · Barclay v. Wabash Ry. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When a man buys stock instead of bonds he takes a greater risk in the business. No one suggests that he has a right to dividends if there are no met earnings. But the investment presupposes that the business is to go on, and therefore even if there are net earnings, the holder of stock, preferred as well as common, is entitled to have a dividend declared only out of such part of them as can be applied to dividends consistently with a wise administration of a going concern.” (Emphasis added.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.