280 U.S. 516
Docket No. 90.
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdictional statement submitted October 14, 1929.
Decided October 28, 1929.
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1929-10-28
2 counsel of record
Relies on Albert Shulthis v. D a McDougal · Hull v. Burr · Norton v. Whiteside
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1929-10-28
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 2012
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Messrs. Wymer Dressier and Robert D. Neely for appellants.
¶2Messrs. J. A. C. Kennedy and Charles L. McLaughlin for appellee.
¶4The appeal is dismissed and certiorari is denied for the want of a federal question · Case Law">substantial federal question on the authority of Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147.