Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 Ala. 193 - Allison v. State

Allison v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
June 1984
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently June 1984 · most notably 368 So. 2d 554 - Sprinkle v. State (1978), Segers v. State (1969)

28 state decisions

220196719701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Denno · Turner v. Louisiana · Ker v. California · Tiner v. State · Allison v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““On this appeal counsel for appellant argue that error affects this record because counsel who represented the appellant in the murder trial were denied the right to examine the written confessory statement made by the appellant prior to its submission into evidence. The record does not sustain this argument. So far as disclosed no pretrial motion to examine the statement was made, and when during the trial defense counsel did request the court to grant a recess and to permit them to examine the statement, such motion was granted. There is therefore no merit in this contention.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Counsel for appellant also contend that the court erred in a portion of its oral instructions to the jury. After reading this portion of the oral instructions, it is our conclusion that it correctly and properly stated the legal principle involved, and is in no wise objectionable. Regardless, no objections were made to the oral charge of the court and in the absence of such objections made during the trial, the question cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. Brackin v. State, 31 Ala.App. 228 , 14 So.2d 383 .” See also Segers v. State, 283 Ala. 682 , 220 So.2d 848 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.