Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 Ark. 21 - Jarboe v. Hicks

Jarboe v. Hicks’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
March 1995
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lilly v. Robinson Mercantile Co. · St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Hurst · Martin v. Pope · Baxter Land Co. v. Gibson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The statute in question provides for a reasonable fee for the attorney against the parties to said action and that the amount of such fee shall not necessarily be limited to the amount of compromise or settlement between the parties litigant. We think this provision of the statute in question, in providing that the fee be reasonable and not limited to the amount of the compromise or settlement, in effect, provides for a fee on a quantum meruit basis. In determining what would be a reasonable fee we take into consideration the amount of time and labor involved, the skill and ability of the attorneys, and the nature and extent of the litigation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.