Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

281 Conn. 918

918 A.2d 270

Intercity Development, LLC v. Andrade

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 28, 2007

Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 2007-02-28

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 2008

1 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment for the plaintiff on its recovery on its mechanic's lien and attorney's fees?”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Intercity Development, LLC v. Andrade

Relies on 96 Conn. App. 608 - Intercity Development, LLC v. Andrade

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-02-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 96 Conn. App. 608 (AC 25918), is granted, limited to the following issue:

¶2“Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment for the plaintiff on its recovery on its mechanic’s lien and attorney’s fees?”

*919The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17848.Robert E. Ghent, in support of the petition.David P. Friedman and Marcy Tench Stovall, in opposition.Decided February 28, 2007
/281/conn/918 · .json · Public domain