Malley v. Walter Baker & Co.’s Empirical Analysis
281 F. 41 · 1922
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1955
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Grimaud · Maryland Casualty Co. v. United States · Noble v. Union River Logging Railroad · United States v. Birdsall · Houghton v. Payne
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The plaintiff is not entitled to recover more than the amount that it can show it paid as a tax on such portions of the product in question as were not sold and used as candy within the meaning of the Department’s regulation.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Candy within the meaning of the act includes ... . sweet chocolate and sweet milk chocolate, whether plain or mixed with fruit or nuts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.