The Neponset

Decided March 20, 1922.)

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1922-03-20

Petition of the Crew Transportation Corporation, as owner of the steam tug Neponset, for limitation of liability. From a cueree absolving the tug from liability for the damage claimed (281 Fed. 409), Mary Labate and another, as administrators, appeal.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1919

1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on The Neponset

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1922-03-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.

¶2Petition of the Crew Transportation Corporation, as owner of the steam tug Neponset, for limitation of liability. From a cueree absolving the tug from liability for the damage claimed (281 Fed. 409), Mary Labate and another, as administrators, appeal.

¶3Affirmed.

¶4Macklin, Brown, Purdy & Van Y\7yck, of New York City (Pierre M. Brown, of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

¶5Foley & Martin, of New York City (George V. A. McCloskey, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

¶6Before HOUGH, MANTON, and MAYER, Circuit Judges.

¶7PER CURIAM.

¶8Decree affirmed. No costs.