Leonard v. Everett’s Empirical Analysis
281 F. 594 · 1922
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 1977
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. Wintroath · De Ferranti v. Harmatta · Wahl v. Main · Chessin v. Klahn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where the tribunals of the Patent Office unite in a conclusion as to” the right to make the counts of an interference relating to a technical matter, “the Court of Appeals will not disturb their action, unless manifestly. wrong.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Oldroyd v. Morgan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.