Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 F.1d 696 - Smith v. United States

Smith v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

281 F. 696 · 1922

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
December 1935
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Holt v. United States · Mattox v. United States · McDonald v. Pless · Holmgren v. United States · Felton v. Spiro

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This after-discovered evidence as to what had occurred some two days before the time the defendant was brought into the matter, as testified to by Mrs.' Self, is to the effect that she had at that time already planned for the trip for a legitimate purpose, with which the defendant was in no manner connected. The value to the accused of this after-discovered evidence cannot well be over-estimated, and the importance of the time of making the arrangement, as set forth in the affidavits, becomes only too apparent.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.