Strunk v. Bomar

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 1960.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1960-06-14

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 1968

2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1960-06-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Walter A. Kelley, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellants.

¶2Henry C. Foutch, Asst. Atty. Gen. of Tennessee, George F. McCanless, Atty. Gen. of Tennessee, on the brief, for ap-pellee.

¶3Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, SIMONS, Senior Judge, and CECIL, Circuit Judge.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised:

¶6Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and is hereby affirmed upon the opinion of Judge William E. Miller.