England v. Doyle’s Empirical Analysis
281 F.2d 304 · 1960
Citation profile
45 federal appellate · 12 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 109 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably Rozier v. Ford Motor Co. (1978), Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp. (1989)
45 federal appellate · 12 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co. · Johnson v. Collier · Root Refining Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 109 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'an unconscionable plan or scheme which is designed to improperly influence the court in its decision.'”
18 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““It is clear that the trustee is not asserting, and indeed could not assert that the petitioning creditor had a legal interest in or right to the property at the time of appellee’s redelivery to Mrs. Mansfeldt.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.