Hale v. Friedman’s Empirical Analysis
281 F.2d 635 · 1960
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 1988
1 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any dispute or controversy arising out of or relating in any way to this Agreement * * * shall be determined by binding arbitration * * *. ****** (b) The arbitrator designated and acting under this Agreement shall make his award in strict conformity with the rules of the American Arbitration Association and shall have no power to depart from or change any of the provisions hereof, and shall determine the controversy in accordance with the laws of the State of New Mexico as applied to the facts found by him. (c) The decision of the arbitrator shall be rendered within forty-five (45) days. * * * [Emphasis added.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.