Anderson v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
281 F.2d 684 · 1960
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
May 1965
most recently cited
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Mooney v. Holohan · Darr v. Burford · Ex Parte Hawk No - on Rule to Show Cause and Return · House v. Mayo · Kemble v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An application for a writ of habeas corpus in behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court shall not be granted unless it appears that the applicant has exhausted the remedies available in the courts of the State, or that there is either an absence of available State corrective process or the existence of circumstances rendering such process ineffective to protect the rights of the prisoner. 13”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Anderson v. Kentucky
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.