Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 F.2d 871 - Steinbrugge v. Haddock

Steinbrugge v. Haddock’s Empirical Analysis

281 F.2d 871 · 1960

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
February 1997
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 1997

12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

901960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Doheny v. . Lacy · Derdyn v. Low · Vargas v. Esquire, Inc. · Farmers Nat. Grain Corporation v. Young · Lewis v. Schafer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““These findings, supported by the evidence, led the trial court to deny the claimed fiducial relationship between Steinbrugge [investor] and Kunsman [geologist], and to place upon Steinbrugge the heavy burden of proving fraud, which he clearly did not sustain.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “frequently arise out of trust and confidence consensually placed in the superior knowledge, skill, or judgment of another.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.