Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 F.3d 430 - Tri-County Paving, Incorporated v. Ashe County Ashe County Board of Commissioners

Tri-County Paving, Incorporated v. Ashe County Ashe County Board of Commissioners’s Empirical Analysis

281 F.3d 430 · 2002

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
2
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably A Helping Hand, LLC v. Baltimore County (2008), Bell v. Duperrault (2004)

14 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

340200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill · City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · Connally v. General Construction Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he constitutional violation actionable under § 1983 is not complete ... unless and until the State fails to provide due process.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “consult the entire panoply of predeprivation and postdeprivation process provided by the state.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The actual motivation for the [local government's] actions [is] irrelevant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.