Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 F.3d 479 - United States v. Chavez

United States v. Chavez’s Empirical Analysis

281 F.3d 479 · 2002

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
3
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably United States v. Lopez-Moreno (2005), United States v. De Jesus-Batres (2005)

27 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

420200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Florida v. Royer · Ornelas v. United States · Singleton v. Wulff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Neither the Supreme Court nor our Court has ruled that there is a suppression remedy for violations of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause, and we do not find it necessary to reach that issue here. For even if we assume arguendo that the Fourteenth Amendment does provide such an exclusionary remedy, it is plain that [the Defendant-Appellant] has failed to offer proof of discriminatory purpose, a necessary predicate of an equal protection violation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the person stopped of criminal activity;”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “more than an inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or hunch.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.