Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 F.3d 516 - Aiken v. Hackett

Aiken v. Hackett’s Empirical Analysis

281 F.3d 516 · 2002

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2022

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

80200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Northeastern Florida Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America v. City of Jacksonville · Texas v. Lesage · Brunet v. City of Columbus · Aiken v. City of Memphis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the plaintiffs allege that a racial preference cost them some benefit under a government program, those plaintiffs may have alleged an injury in fact. But if those same plaintiffs cannot also allege and show that “under a race-neutral policy” they would have received the benefit, those plaintiffs have not alleged an injury in fact because they have not alleged an invasion of some interest that the law protects.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.