Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 F.3d 771 - United States v. Blanton

United States v. Blanton’s Empirical Analysis

281 F.3d 771 · 2002

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently January 2025

14 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

190200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1623

Relies on United States v. Willis · United States v. Lamere · United States v. Phillips · United States v. Leon-Reyes · United States v. Rude

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The statements need not be material to any particular issue, but may be material to any proper matter of inquiry.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “whether or not the statements alleged to be perjurious tend to impede or hamper the course”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.