Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 F.3d 940 - Eunique v. Powell

Eunique v. Powell’s Empirical Analysis

281 F.3d 940 · 2002

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
August 2002
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Cantwell v. State of Connecticut · Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc. · Agostini v. Felton Chancellor Board of Education of the City of New York · Reno v. Flores · Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There can be no doubt that the failure of parents to support their children is recognized by our society as a serious offense against morals and welfare. It “is in violation of important social duties [and is] subversive of good order.” Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. 599, 603 , 81 S.Ct. 1144, 1146 , 6 L.Ed.2d 563 (1961). It is the very kind of problem that the legislature can address. Moreover, the economic problems caused by parents who fail to provide support for their children are both well known and widespread. They can be exacerbated when the non-paying parent is out of the state, as, of course, a parent traveling internationally must be. Indeed, even within the United States itself, the problem is serious.... ... [International travel by what our society often calls “deadbeat parents” presents even more difficulties because the United States cannot easily reach them once they have left the country. ... All of this not only illustrates the rationality of Congress’ goal, but also demonstrates its rational connection to the passport denial in question.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.