Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 FRD 314 - Acosta v. Target Corp.

Acosta v. Target Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1637 (§ 127 of the Truth in Lending Act)

Relies on Upjohn Company v. United States · United States v. Nobles · Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of Energy · Memorial Hospital v. Shadur · United States v. Lawless

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[c]ourts are divided about even the basic question of whether it is sufficient to list an e-mail chain as a single entry or whether each individual e-mail within the chain must be identified.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.