APCC Services, Inc. v. AT & T CORP.’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1359 · 47 U.S.C. § 206
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. Stevens · American Telephone and Telegraph Company, v. Central Office Telephone, Inc. · Spiller v. Atchison T & S F Ry Co · Titus v. Wallick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any order or other form of decision, however designated, which adjudicates fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties ... is subject to revision at any time before the entry of judgment adjudicating all the claims and the rights and liabilities of all the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cobell v. Norton“long line of cases and legal treatises that recognize a well-established principle that assignees for collection purposes are entitled to bring suit where [as here] the assignments transfer absolute title to the claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.