Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 Ga. 119 - Waters v. State

Waters v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2020

18 state decisions

120200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Franks v. Delaware · Rhode Island v. Innis · Oregon v. Elstad · Malcolm v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Voluntary statements made by unwarned suspects in custodial interrogation are presumed to be compulsory and are inadmissible at trial. See Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U. S. 298 , 307 (105 SC 1285, 84 LE2d 222) (1985) (“Failure to administer Miranda warnings creates a presumption of compulsion. Consequently, unwarned statements that are otherwise voluntary . . . must nevertheless be excluded from evidence under Miranda.”)] Livingston v. State, 264 Ga. 402 (6) ( 444 SE2d 748 ) (1994).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Interrogation for the purposes of Miranda warnings encompasses express questioning and words and actions that officers should know are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the subject.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[I]f the court does not find that the lineup was suggestive then it need not reach the issue of whether there was a substantial likelihood of misidentification.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.