Stinski v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently August 2023
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wardius v. Oregon · Blalock v. Blalock · State v. Young · Taylor v. State · Hutcheson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“requires a defendant to produce, at or before the announcement of a guilt/innocence verdict, books, papers, documents, photographs, films, recordings, tangible objects, and audio and visual recordings and to allow inspection and photographing of buildings if the defendant intends to use any of these items as evidence in the sentencing phase. OCGA § 17-16-4 (b) (3) (A). A defendant must also disclose, at or before the guilt/innocence verdict, reports regarding any mental health examinations or other scientific tests that the defendant intends to introduce into evidence in the sentencing phase. OCGA § 17-16-4 (b) (3) (B). Finally, a defendant must disclose five days before trial the identity of witnesses the defendant intends to call at sentencing and must disclose at or before the guilt/innocence verdict any non-privileged statements of those witnesses [that relate to the subject matter of the testimony of such witnesses] that are in the defendant’s possession. OCGA§ 17-16-4 (b) (3) (C).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Muhammad v. State“[although “the burden of proving that the search and seizure were lawful shall be on the [S]tate,” [cits.], the defendant bears the burden of proof where his or her standing to raise a challenge to the legality of a search or seizure is contested by the State. [Cits.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lowe v. State“Georgia's long-standing rule that inadmissible hearsay lacks probative value even though the opposing party does not object to its introduction”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.