Mathis v. Mathis’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Wright v. Wright · Campbell v. Campbell · Payson v. Payson · Moore v. Moore · 142 Ga. App. 100 - Pruitt v. First National Bank of Habersham County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“However, a superior court judge is not required to make findings of fact in a nonjury trial unless requested to do so by one of the parties prior to the entry of the written judgment, and neither party asked the trial court to make findings of fact. 1 Inasmuch as the issues on appeal depend upon the factual determinations made by the trial court as factfinder and neither party asked the trial court to make factual findings, we are unable to conclude that the trial court's equitable distribution of marital property was improper as a matter of law or as a matter of fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Alfaro v. Alfaro“the actual division of marital property will be upheld as long as it falls within the broad discretion of the factfinder.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Alfaro v. Alfaro
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.