Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 Ga. App. 844 - Price v. State

281 Ga. App. 844 - Price v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · North Carolina v. Pearce · Bordenkircher v. Hayes · Chaffin v. Stynchcombe · Corbitt v. New Jersey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A criminal defendant should not be allowed to reject a sentence concession that is offered in return for a guilty plea and then bind the State to that rejected original lenient sentence even though he is later convicted after a trial. To hold otherwise would allow a criminal defendant to go to trial and seek an acquittal knowing that, even if unsuccessful, he would receive a sentence which is no less lenient than that which he was originally offered. After trial, the factors that may have indicated leniency as consideration for the guilty plea are no longer present.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “On appeal, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict and the appellant no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence; moreover, on appeal this [CJourt determines evidence sufficiency and does not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.