People v. Rayford’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Ross · 139 Ill. 2d 300 - People v. Janis · 188 Ill. App. 3d 499 - People v. Penny · 128 Ill. App. 3d 668 - People v. Joseph · 84 Ill. App. 3d 531 - People v. DeCuir
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The issue in [Rayford’s] case did not involve a deficiency in the warrant which ultimately led to the exclusion of evidence confiscated pursuant thereto. The pivotal determination in defendant’s case is whether the computer data accurately reflected all of the information about the stolen car known to the police at the time of defendant’s arrest.” Rayford, 281 Ill. App. 3d at 600 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.