Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 KAN 1154 - Flynn v. State

Flynn v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently May 2021 · most notably Bellamy v. State (2007), State v. Cheatham (2013)

30 state decisions

240200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · United States v. Cronic · Tonnies v. Unisys Corp. · State v. Gleason

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Trial counsel has the responsibility for making tactical and strategic decisions including the determination of which witnesses will testify. Even though experienced attorneys might disagree on the best tactics or strategy, deliberate decisions based on strategy may not establish ineffective assistance of counsel. Strategic choices based on a thorough investigation of the law and- facts are virtually unchallengeable.” Flynn v. State, 281 Kan. 1154 , Syl. ¶ 5, 136 P.3d 909 (2006).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “K.A.R. 105-3-2 does not short circuit the application of the two-part [Strickland] test or abolish the defendant's burden to identify specific acts or omissions that fall outside the range of reasonable professional judgment and demonstrate prejudice based on deficient performance”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.