State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably State v. Herbel (2013), State v. Trotter (2013)
34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dusky v. United States · Pate v. Robinson · Drope v. Missouri · Medina v. California · McGregor v. Gibson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““At any time after the defendant has been charged with a crime and before pronouncement of sentence, the defendant, the defendant’s counsel or the prosecuting attorney may request a determination of the defendant’s competency to stand trial. If, upon the request of either party or upon the judge’s own knowledge and observation, the judge before whom the case is pending finds that there is reason to believe that the defendant is incompetent to stand trial the proceedings shall be suspended and a hearing conducted to determine the competency of the defendant.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Roberts · State v. Murray“'(1) [T]he passage of time, (2) the availability of contemporaneous medical evidence, including medical records and prior competency determinations, (3) any statements by the defendant in the trial record, and (4) the availability of individuals and trial witnesses, both experts and non-experts, who were in a position to interact with defendant before and during trial, including the trial judge, counsel for both the government and defendant, and jail officials. [Citation omitted.]'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Jenkins“because a judgment that is rendered without jurisdiction is void (State v. Chatman, 234 Kan. 197, 205 , 671 P.2d 531 [1983]), it may be”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Breedlove
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.