Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 KAN 195 - State v. Bischoff

State v. Bischoff’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

22 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on City of Boerne v. Flores · State v. Davis · In re L.A. · State v. Smith · State v. Kesselring

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court may permit a complaint or information to be amended at any time before verdict or finding if no additional or different crime is charged and if substantial rights of the defendant are not prejudiced.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he charging of a different crime may be allowed via an amended complaint before trial, provided the substantial rights of the defendant are not prejudiced.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Discretion is abused only when no reasonable person would take the view adopted by the district court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.