State v. Porting’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
96 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 96 later decisions — most recently March 2021 · most notably State v. Thompson (2007), State v. Pollman (2008)
96 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Payton v. New York · United States v. Matlock · Illinois v. Rodriguez · Minnesota v. Olson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In other words, the rule applies to situations in which an officer would have had valid consent to search if the facts were as the officer reasonably believed them to be.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Boggess“the facts available to the officer would warrant a person of reasonable caution to believe that the consenting party had authority over the premises 15 to be searched.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Boggess“provides protection identical to that provided under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Daniels
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.