Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 KAN 600 - State v. Nash

State v. Nash’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
2
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably State v. Trotter (2013), State v. Edwards (2010)

42 state decisions

240200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Aikins · State v. Graham · State v. Gayden · State v. Walker · State v. Nash

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The relief available under the statute is correction of a sentence, rather than reversal of a conviction.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. State v. Robertson · State v. Ross
  2. ““The defendant herein is seeking reversal of his conviction of aggravated robbery as opposed to correction of the sentence imposed on the conviction. In essence, the defendant is seeking to use the correction of an illegal sentence statute as the vehicle for a collateral attack on a conviction. Such relief is not available under K.S.A. 22-3504. “The district court should have denied relief on the basis that the only relief sought was not available under the statute. However, where the trial court reaches the right result, it will not be reversed even though its reasoning was not correct. State v. Graham, 277 Kan. 121, 133 , 83 P.3d 143 (2004).” 281 Kan. at 602.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. State v. Horton · State v. Hoge

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.