Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 Mich. 554 - Curley v. Beryllium Development Corp.

Curley v. Beryllium Development Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 1998
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kalucki v. American Car & Foundry Co. · Detroit Tug & Wrecking Co. v. Gartner · Brunette v. Quincy Mining Co. · Curley v. Beryllium Corporation · Collins v. Albert A. Albrecht Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It would have been an abuse of discretion on the part of the department had recognition been given to the reason alleged.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is a maxim of the law that `ignorance excuses no one'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.