Knight v. Merignac’s Empirical Analysis
1937
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
October 1948
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kerr v. Hayes · Zuidema v. Bekkering
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It will not do to say that plaintiff’s husband looked down the Byron Center Road to the left before attempting to cross the pavement and did not see the automobile of defendant approaching. He must be held to have seen what he should have seen, which there was nothing to prevent him from seeing, and if, as contended by plaintiff, he stopped his automobile, looked to the left, and did not see what was plainly to be seen, the approach of defendant’s auto mobile, he was guilty of contributory negligence which would bar plaintiff’s recovery.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Carey v. De Rose
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.