Kasner v. Gage’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
2 district · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently August 2001
2 district · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Frankle v. Twedt · Porter v. Grennan Bakeries, Inc. · Barrett v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. · Laurie v. Mueller · Plotkin v. Northland Transportation Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) whether or not the act is one commonly done by such servants; [[Image here]] (c) the previous relations between the master and the servant; [[Image here]] (e) whether or not the act is outside the enterprise of the master [[Image here]] (f) whether or not the master has reason to expect that such an act will be done; (g) the similarity in quality of the act done to the act authorized; (h) whether or not the instrumentality by which the harm is done has been furnished by the master to the servant; (i) the extent of departure from the normal method of accomplishing an authorized result; and (j) whether or not the act is seriously criminal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The Restatement of Agency is a normative statement of principles for determining when a master or principal may be liable for the tortious or criminal acts of a servant or other agent when ... the principal has not actually authorized or ratified unlawful conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.