Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 N.C. 1 - State v. Harvey

State v. Harvey’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

468
cited by 468 later decisions
8
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

467 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 468 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably State v. Brown (1984), Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc. (1990)

467 state decisions

151019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Aguilar v. Texas · Jones v. United States · Draper v. United States · Ker v. State of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 468 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “he has both the power and intent to control its disposition or use.”
    51 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The Fourth Amendment requirement that no warrant shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the persons or things to be seized, applies to arrest warrants as well as to search warrants. The judicial officer issuing such warrant must be supplied with sufficient information to support an independent judgment that there is probable cause for issuing the arrest warrant.” (Citation omitted.) State v. Harvey, 281 N.C. 1, 6 , 187 S.E. 2d 706, 710 (1972).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he trial court is not required to submit lesser degrees of a crime to the jury `when the State's evidence is positive as to each and every element of the crime charged and there is no conflicting evidence relating to any element of the charged crime.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.