Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 N.J. Super. 502 - State v. Tekel

281 N.J. Super. 502 - State v. Tekel’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
January 2011
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently January 2011

20 state decisions

100199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brewer v. Porch · Kimmelman v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc. · NJ Builders, Owners and Managers Association v. Blair · State v. Tischio · State v. Gill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`where a literal rendering of a statute will lead to a result not in accord with the essential purpose and design of the act, the spirit of the law will control the letter.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a. Except as provided in subsection b. of this section, the municipal court shall revoke the right to operate a motor vehicle of any operator who, after being arrested for a violation of R.S. 39:4-50, shall refuse to submit to a test provided for in section 2 of P.L. 1966, c. 142 (C. 39:4-50.2) when requested to do so, for not less than seven months or more than one year unless the refusal was in connection with a second offense under this section, in which case the revocation period shall be for two years or unless the refusal was in connection with a third or subsequent offense under this section in which case the revocation shall be for ten years. (emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the arresting officer had probable cause to believe that the person had been driving or was in actual physical control of a motor vehicle ... while ... under the influence of intoxicating liquor”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.