State v. Blohm’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently September 2010
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Presley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If defendant had requested an instruction that the evidence was admissible only for corroborative purposes and not substantively, he would have been entitled to it, but he did not request it. The court’s failure to do it on its own was not prejudicial error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Loftus v. State“[First complaint evidence is] not even hearsay under Rule 801(c), Rules of Evidence, since it [is] not admitted for the purpose of proving the truth of the matter asserted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.