Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

281 N.Y. 395

24 N.E.2d 96

Ream v. Ream

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 1939

New York Court of Appeals · decided 1939-11-15

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1969

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1939-11-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1 The defendant Bethel Veech Ream, having given notice to the court that he has attained the age of twenty-one years, is entitled to appear upon the appeal by attorneys of his own selection. Sherman & Goldring, having filed a notice of appearance for the defendant, may appear in his behalf upon the argument of the appeal and will then be free to state the position which the defendant desires to take upon the appeal.

¶2 The motion to dismiss the appeal should be granted to the extent indicated in this opinion; otherwise denied.

/281/ny/395 · .json · Public domain