¶1 Judgment affirmed; no opinion. (See 281 N. Y. 676.)
¶2 Concur: Crane, Ch. J., O’Brien, Hubbs and Finch, JJ. Dissenting: Lehman, Loughran and Rippey, JJ., on the ground that the testimony of Vera Lorden was erroneously admitted.
281 N.Y. 651
22 N.E.2d 482
Decided July 11, 1939
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1939-07-11
Relies on East River Savings Bank v. 671 Prospect Avenue Holding Corp.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1939-07-11
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 2014
2 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 Judgment affirmed; no opinion. (See 281 N. Y. 676.)
¶2 Concur: Crane, Ch. J., O’Brien, Hubbs and Finch, JJ. Dissenting: Lehman, Loughran and Rippey, JJ., on the ground that the testimony of Vera Lorden was erroneously admitted.