281 Or. App. 182 - State v. Teagues’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A trial court's erroneous failure to give a concurrence instruction is not harmless when, given the evidence and the parties' theories, jurors could have based their verdicts on different occurrences.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“as to one of the alleged incidents but not the other, or vice-versa, yielding an impermissible 'mix-and-match' verdict”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.