State v. Villagomez’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"(A) The delivery was of heroin, cocaine, methamphetamine, lysergic acid diethylamide, psilocybin or psilocin and was for consideration; "(B) The offender was in possession of $300 or more in cash; "(C) The offender was unlawfully in possession of a firearm or other weapon as described in ORS 166.270 (2), or the offender used, attempted to use or threatened to use a deadly or dangerous weapon as defined in ORS 161.015, or the offender was in possession of a firearm or other deadly or dangerous weapon as defined in ORS 161.015 for the purpose of using it in connection with a controlled substance offense; "(D) The offender was in possession of materials being used for the packaging of controlled substances such as scales, wrapping or foil, other than the material being used to contain the substance that is the subject of the offense; "(E) The offender was in possession of drug transaction records or customer lists; "(F) The offender was in possession of stolen property; "(G) Modification of structures by painting, wiring, plumbing or lighting to facilitate a controlled substance offense; "(H) The offender was in possession of manufacturing paraphernalia, including recipes, precursor chemicals, laboratory equipment, lighting, ventilating or power generating equipment; "(I) The offender was using public lands for the manufacture of controlled substances; "(J) The offender had constructed fortifications or had taken security measures with the potential of injuring persons; or "(K)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Villagomez

2. “CDO factor as we have construed it. 11 Thus, the trial court erred in denying defendant's motion for a judgment of acquittal on that factor. And, as the Court of Appeals held, without the”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Villagomez

3. “Tape Recording, House Committee on Judiciary, Subcommittee on Crime and Corrections, HB 2390, Jan. 30, 1991, Tape 11, Side A (statement of Rep. Mason). Representative Mason described”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Villagomez