Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 ORAPP 523 - State v. Hensley

State v. Hensley’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If a defendant is interrogated in violation of his right to counsel under Article I, section 11, any evidence discovered as a result-including evidence of other crimes-must be suppressed unless the state demonstrates that the evidence was not the product of the constitutional violation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “conclusion that predictable investigatory procedures would have produced the evidence at issue must be substantiated by factual findings that are fairly supported by the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(3) the illegal conduct was independent of, or only tenuously related to the disputed evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.