State v. S. R. J.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

16 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “we view the evidence, as supplemented and buttressed by permissible derivative inferences, in the light most favorable to the trial court's disposition and assess whether, when so viewed, the record was legally sufficient to permit that outcome.”

   5 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 297 Or. App. 121 - State v. S.E.R. (In re S.E.R.) · 296 Or. App. 703 - State v. T. M. (In re T. M.)

2. “Given the serious deprivation of liberty and social stigma that are attendant to a civil commitment, and the fact that such a preventive confinement is predicated on a prediction of future behavior, our cases have articulated certain minimum evidentiary standards for commitment.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 290 Or. App. 1 - State v. B. A. F. (In re B. A. F.) · 295 Or. App. 228 - State v. J. P. (In re J. P.)

3. “Whether the evidence of danger is legally sufficient to support a determination that appellant is 'dangerous' for purposes of ORS 426.005(1) is a determination that we review as a matter of law.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 296 Or. App. 703 - State v. T. M. (In re T. M.) · 293 Or. App. 376 - State v. T. T. (In re T. T.)