Green v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1955
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 1994
2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 92 Okla. Crim. 182 - Martin v. State · 89 Okla. Crim. 294 - Ladd v. State · 5 Okla. Crim. 522 - Ridley v. State · 62 Okla. Crim. 361 - Raab v. State · 19 Okla. Crim. 224 - Montgomery v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““After the jury have retired for deliberation, if . they desire to be informed on a point of law arising in the cause, they must require the officer to conduct them into court. . . . ” (Emphasis added)”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Duke v. State · Boyd v. State““It will be observed that the language employed by the legislature in the foregoing statutes is not permissive, but mandatory, as follows: ‘They must require the officer to conduct them into court’, whether they seek information on the face of the record as to testimony, or seek information on a point of law.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Badgwell v. State““It will be presumed, in the absence of anything to the contrary, that the rights of the defendant were prejudiced by the action of the jury. . . . Courts cannot be too strict in compelling a rigid and vigilant observance of the provisions of the statutes . . . .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wilson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.