Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 P2D 441 - Miller v. State

Miller v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
November 1987
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently November 1987

5 state decisions

201955196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Kennedy · Hedderich v. State · 89 Okla. Crim. 421 - Wilson v. State · State v. Central Lumber Co. · State v. Allen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Although the caption placed on the indictment by the county attorney describes the crime as ‘furnishing narcotics,’ it is established law that the caption to the indictment does not control in determining the nature of the offense allegedly charged but the words stated in the body of the indictment must be considered in the light in which they are used to determine whether they charge an offense. Shiever v. State, 92 Okl.Cr. 239 , 222 P.2d 530 ; Wilson v. State, 89 Okl.Cr. 421 , 209 P.2d 512 , 212 P.2d 144 ; Bristow v. State, 86 Okl.Cr. 97 , 189 P.2d 629 ; Hulsey v. State, 86 Okl.Cr. 273 , 192 P.2d 301 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““No question as to the sanity of the accused was ever presented in the instant case other than the motion which was filed asking that he be committed to the mental hospital for observation.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.