Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 P2D 743 - Cullison v. Triplett

Cullison v. Triplett’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 1997
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 1997

6 state decisions

3019551960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Beck v. Peard · Borman v. Geib · Atkins v. Bean

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Wheré an affidavit for continuance discloses that it is not made for delay, but by reason of absence of the party' plaintiff caused by illness, and, where' it further appears that said cause could be disposed of thereafter without delay, it is an abuse of discretion to deny such continuance.” ‘ ■ '”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Where a continuance is sought ón account of the absence of a party to the action,' if it clearly appears that the trial court abused its discretion in overruling the motion for-such continuance, this court will reverse the judgment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.