Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 Pa. Super. 521 - Itri v. Lewis

281 Pa. Super. 521 - Itri v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
2
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably 334 Pa. Super. 295 - Agriss v. Roadway Express, Inc. (1984), 315 Pa. Super. 135 - Spain v. Vicente (1983)

23 state decisions

1701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Corabi v. Curtis Publishing Co. · Otto v. American Mutual Insurance · International Union of Operating Engineers v. Linesville Construction Co. · 256 Pa. Super. 427 - Vitteck v. Washington Broadcasting Co. · Commonwealth v. Austin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although it is preferable that the exact [defamatory] words be stated in the complaint, often the exact words are not known. However, although the exact words need not be stated, the complaint must specify the substance of the spoken words; the purport of the spoken words is necessary. [When] the complaint does not specify the words in substance used by the defendant, it is defective. It is also defective for failure to identify any persons to whom the alleged statements were made. 11”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In an action for slander the complaint is sufficient if it contains the substance of the spoken words.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.